Elementary, my dear Watson.
Only — Sherlock doesn’t say that anymore.
There is no question that Sherlock Holmes is one of the best-known, best-loved fictional characters of all time.
But largely thanks to Basil Rathbone’s marvelous — but distinctly middle age and very, very cold — Holmes, and a succession of wannabe Basil Rathbone interpretations which followed, it has, until now failed to enamor many parents.
That, however, might now change, thanks to two very different, very compelling new Sherlock Holmeses on the block: those of Robert Downey, Jr, and Benedict Cumberbatch.
Asking which I prefer would be asking whether I prefer a good cheddar or a good stilton. Love ’em both.
And what they both do, in very different ways, is rescue Holmes from the cultural cliché he had almost become and inject him with new life; the one by giving it the Holywood action-adventure-spy treatment, albeit preserving the late nineteenth century setting (well, kind of); the other by bringing Holmes bang up to date with clever new twists on the old tales.
Cumberbatch’s Holmes may be out of his original time (not that that hasn’t been done before — most of Rathbone’s films had a contemporary setting too), but in my opinion he’s actually the most faithful to Doyle’s original.
And, let’s not beat about the bush, both Robert and Benedict have “seriously attractive” stamped all over them.
If they can’t make people start to seriously consider Sherlock as a name, nothing will.
Plus, it really is a great name.
A surname, no less, in origin.
Nowhere is it stated in Conan Doyle’s work how Sherlock got his name, but it is a safe bet that as a man who came from a clan of “country squires,” somewhere in his family tree, it featured originally as a surname.
It may have been a family name in the Holmeses for centuries, or it may have been his mother’s maiden name, or it may have been the surname of a family friend. We simply don’t know.
It derives from the Old English scīr “bright,” and “shining” (the same source as “sheer”) and loc(c) “lock (of hair),” which as surnames-as-first-name meanings go, is appealing.
And while any child called Sherlock would have to get used to being called Holmes, there are certainly many names, some of them quite popular, with far worse and more irritating “jokes” lying in wait to torment someone with.
If I were called Sherlock, I might adopt Holmes as a nickname myself, and have done with it. Rug from under feet and all that.
There’s also the contemporary Lock, which I’ve personally liked for a long time.
And if you were to be very daring, and like turning things on their heads, and gave Sherlock to a girl, then Sher and Sherry naturally present themselves.
What Sherlock Holmes himself would have thought to being called Sherry though, I wouldn’t like to say!